(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

transpose(A, B) :- transpose_aux(A, [], B).
transpose_aux(.(R, Rs), X1, .(C, Cs)) :- ','(row2col(R, .(C, Cs), Cols1, Accm), transpose_aux(Rs, Accm, Cols1)).
transpose_aux([], X, X).
row2col(.(X, Xs), .(.(X, Ys), Cols), .(Ys, Cols1), .([], As)) :- row2col(Xs, Cols, Cols1, As).
row2col([], [], [], []).

Query: transpose(g,a)

(1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Built DT problem from termination graph DT10.

(2) Obligation:

Triples:

row2colA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) :- row2colA(X2, X4, X5, X6).
pB(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6), X7) :- row2colA(X2, X4, X5, X6).
pB(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6, .(X7, X8)) :- ','(row2colcC(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6), pB(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8)).
transposeD(.(X1, X2), .(X3, X4)) :- pB(X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, X2).

Clauses:

row2colcA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) :- row2colcA(X2, X4, X5, X6).
row2colcA([], [], [], []).
qcB(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6, .(X7, X8)) :- ','(row2colcC(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6), qcB(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8)).
qcB(X1, X2, X3, X4, X4, []) :- row2colcC(X1, X2, X3, X4, X4).
row2colcC(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) :- row2colcA(X2, X4, X5, X6).

Afs:

transposeD(x1, x2)  =  transposeD(x1)

(3) TriplesToPiDPProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [DT09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
transposeD_in: (b,f)
pB_in: (b,f,f,f,f,b)
row2colA_in: (b,f,f,f)
row2colcC_in: (b,f,f,f,f)
row2colcA_in: (b,f,f,f)
Transforming TRIPLES into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(.(X1, X2), .(X3, X4)) → U5_GA(X1, X2, X3, X4, pB_in_gaaaag(X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, X2))
TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(.(X1, X2), .(X3, X4)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, X2)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6), X7) → U2_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, row2colA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
PB_IN_GAAAAG(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6), X7) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U1_GAAA(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6, .(X7, X8)) → U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_in_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6)) → U4_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, pB_in_gaaaag(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa([], [], [], []) → row2colcA_out_gaaa([], [], [], [])
U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcA_out_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6))
U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcC_out_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
pB_in_gaaaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  pB_in_gaaaag(x1, x6)
row2colA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colA_in_gaaa(x1)
row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1)
U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x7)
row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1)
U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x7)
[]  =  []
row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x4)
row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x5)
TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(x1)
U5_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U5_GA(x1, x2, x5)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x6)
U2_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  U2_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x7, x8)
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1)
U1_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U1_GAAA(x1, x2, x7)
U3_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9)  =  U3_GAAAAG(x1, x7, x8, x9)
U4_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9)  =  U4_GAAAAG(x1, x6, x7, x8, x9)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiDP implies Termination of TRIPLES

(4) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(.(X1, X2), .(X3, X4)) → U5_GA(X1, X2, X3, X4, pB_in_gaaaag(X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, X2))
TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(.(X1, X2), .(X3, X4)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, X2)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6), X7) → U2_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, row2colA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
PB_IN_GAAAAG(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6), X7) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U1_GAAA(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6, .(X7, X8)) → U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_in_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6)) → U4_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, pB_in_gaaaag(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa([], [], [], []) → row2colcA_out_gaaa([], [], [], [])
U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcA_out_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6))
U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcC_out_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
pB_in_gaaaag(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  pB_in_gaaaag(x1, x6)
row2colA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colA_in_gaaa(x1)
row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1)
U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x7)
row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1)
U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x7)
[]  =  []
row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x4)
row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x5)
TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  TRANSPOSED_IN_GA(x1)
U5_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U5_GA(x1, x2, x5)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x6)
U2_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8)  =  U2_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x7, x8)
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1)
U1_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U1_GAAA(x1, x2, x7)
U3_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9)  =  U3_GAAAAG(x1, x7, x8, x9)
U4_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9)  =  U4_GAAAAG(x1, x6, x7, x8, x9)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 2 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa([], [], [], []) → row2colcA_out_gaaa([], [], [], [])
U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcA_out_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6))
U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcC_out_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1)
U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x7)
row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1)
U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x7)
[]  =  []
row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x4)
row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x5)
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(9) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2, X4, X5, X6)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
[]  =  []
ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(10) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(.(X1, X2)) → ROW2COLA_IN_GAAA(X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6, .(X7, X8)) → U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_in_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, .(X4, X5), X6)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X7, X4, X5, X9, X10, X8)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6)) → U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6))
row2colcA_in_gaaa([], [], [], []) → row2colcA_out_gaaa([], [], [], [])
U7_gaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcA_out_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .(.(X1, X3), X4), .(X3, X5), .([], X6))
U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X4, X5, X6)) → row2colcC_out_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .(X1, X3), X4, .(X3, X5), .([], X6))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x1)
U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U11_gaaaa(x1, x2, x7)
row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_in_gaaa(x1)
U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7)  =  U7_gaaa(x1, x2, x7)
[]  =  []
row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  row2colcA_out_gaaa(x1, x4)
row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  row2colcC_out_gaaaa(x1, x5)
PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  PB_IN_GAAAAG(x1, x6)
U3_GAAAAG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9)  =  U3_GAAAAG(x1, x7, x8, x9)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(15) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, .(X7, X8)) → U3_GAAAAG(X1, X7, X8, row2colcC_in_gaaaa(X1))
U3_GAAAAG(X1, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X6)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X7, X8)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(.(X1, X2)) → U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2))
row2colcA_in_gaaa(.(X1, X2)) → U7_gaaa(X1, X2, row2colcA_in_gaaa(X2))
row2colcA_in_gaaa([]) → row2colcA_out_gaaa([], [])
U7_gaaa(X1, X2, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X6)) → row2colcA_out_gaaa(.(X1, X2), .([], X6))
U11_gaaaa(X1, X2, row2colcA_out_gaaa(X2, X6)) → row2colcC_out_gaaaa(.(X1, X2), .([], X6))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

row2colcC_in_gaaaa(x0)
row2colcA_in_gaaa(x0)
U7_gaaa(x0, x1, x2)
U11_gaaaa(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • U3_GAAAAG(X1, X7, X8, row2colcC_out_gaaaa(X1, X6)) → PB_IN_GAAAAG(X7, X8)
    The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1, 3 >= 2

  • PB_IN_GAAAAG(X1, .(X7, X8)) → U3_GAAAAG(X1, X7, X8, row2colcC_in_gaaaa(X1))
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 2 > 3

(18) YES